Plays in Australian politics: PM’s Crazy Ivan works


Prime Minister Julia Gillard in the end had no contender to face in the ballot.

Her Crazy Ivan Play, which the Playmaker Standard Table of Influence (the structured table and map of Plays and counter-Plays that can be run to influence an audience or a group) summarizes as a the deliberate acceleration of an impending threat or attack, worked.

No-one, it seems, was prepared to challenge her, despite the Plays being run around her and on her from within her own Party. Those Plays from MPs who included Simon Crean and Joel Fitzgibbon, fell flat.

The reasons for running a Crazy Ivan Play include the desire to get past a negative as quickly as possible, to force a mistake by the opposition (in the case presumably much of the rest of Labor, certainly those running Plays against her) and a lack of other options. Any and all of these may well be the reasons she took this option.

She lives to fight yet another day.

(Read my earlier posts: Plays in Australian politics: Labor calls leadership ballot, and Plays in Australian Politics: form a queue.)

About alansmithoz

Head of Strategic Business Communications at Australian social analytics technology company Digivizer, with a background in corporate public relations and marketing. I do what I do because I believe communications can make a difference.
This entry was posted in General, Influence Strategy. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a reply: connecting and communicating counts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s